Felicity Conditions Definition and Examples

In  pragmatics  (the study of how to do things with words)  and speech-act theory, the term felicity conditions refers to the conditions that must be in place and the criteria that must be satisfied for a speech act to achieve its purpose. In other words, says Mark Liberman, an instructor at the  University of Pennsylvania, a sentence must not only be  grammatical  to be correctly performed, it must also be  felicitous, or well-suited for the purpose. English Language and Linguistics Online  (ELLO) gives the example of a marriage scene in a movie: Have you ever asked yourself  why the words I now pronounce you husband and wife do not create a legal marriage between two people when uttered in the context of a film set? Of course, the actors in the scene are not really legally married, even if they both say I do, before the thespian justice of the peace or clergyperson recites these words. The conditions are not in place and the criteria are not satisfied for this  speech act  to achieve its purpose—namely that the bride and groom enter into a marriage that is legally binding. And the person officiating has no legal authority to pronounce the two husband and wife. Thus, the speech act in the movie marriage scene is not felicitous. Types of Felicity Conditions There are several types of felicitous conditions, notes ELLO, including the following: Propositional content, which requires participants to understand language, not to  act  like actorsPreparatory, where the authority of the speaker and the circumstances of the speech act are appropriate to its being performed successfullySincerity, where the speech act is being performed seriously and sincerelyEssential, where the  speaker intends that an utterance be acted upon by the addressee For example, Patrick Colm Hogan in Philosophical Approaches to the Study of Literature describes felicity conditions with this example: Suppose I am in a play and deliver the line I promise to kill the evil Don Fernando. I have not, in fact, promised to kill anyone. ... The speech act  fails because, among other things, I must have a certain institutional authority for my words to have the appropriate  illocutionary force. ... [The] speech act [also] fails because the words are uttered in a  context  where they are not used by the speaker, but in effect quoted from a text. In this example, Hogans speech is infelicitous because he does not meet the propositional content condition: He  is actually acting. He also does not meet the preparatory condition because he certainly  does not have the authority to kill anyone. He doesnt meet the sincerity condition because he doesnt actually intend to kill anyone—as noted, he is only acting. And he doesnt meet the essential condition because hes not expecting that his words will be acted upon; in other words, he doesnt actually intend for someone else to kill Fernando. Other Examples and Observations Performatives  are  utterances  in which saying is doing, and they are only successful if certain  felicity conditions  are fulfilled, says author  Guy Cook in his book Discourse  (Language Teaching: A Scheme for Teacher Education). For a speech act to be felicitous, says Cook: The sender believes the action should be done.The receiver has the ability to do the action.The receiver has the obligation to do the action.The sender has the right to tell the receiver to do the action. If  any one  of these conditions is not fulfilled, the utterances  are not felicitous. The reason is that felicity conditions are conventions that speakers and addressees use as a code to produce and recognize actions, says psychology professor William Turnbull in Language in Action: Psychological Models of Conversation. In other words, says Turnbull, for felicity conditions to exist, the speaker must utter words that are heard by receivers. The receiver then should take some kind of action based on those words. If the speaker is unintelligible, lacks the authority or status to speak those words, or is insincere, then her utterances are infelicitous. If the listener doesnt act on those words, then the speech is infelicitous. Only if all of these conditions are met  are the utterances from the speaker considered felicitous. Sources Cook, Guy. Discourse (Language Teaching: A Scheme for Teacher Education). Paperback, 1st Edition edition, OUP Oxford, June 29, 1989. Hogan, Patrick Colm. Philosophical Approaches to the Study of Literature. Hardcover, 1st edition, University Press of Florida, September 30, 2001. Turnbull, William. Language in Action: Psychological Models of Conversation. International Series in Social Psychology, 1st Edition, Routledge, April 13, 2003.