Ruperts Land: The Division Lies Only in Interpretation :: American America History

Ruperts Land The Division Lies Only in InterpretationI sit here(predicate) and I consider myself a young and developing Historian. I consider Frits Pannekoek and Irene M. Spry to be similar historians, yet with more knowledge, age, and experience. What I am trustworthy does not differ between myself, these Authors and other related Historians, is a certain degree of ability to take a piece(s) of work and critically canalize it. I have done just that recently. I have taken the evidences, The Flock Divided Fractions and Feuds at Red river by Frits Pannekoek and The Metis and Mixed-Bloods of Ruperts Land before 1870 by Irene M. Spry, and I have done my own critical analysis. I believe that both Authors are very persuasive in their respective essay, however when analysed and broken drop the reader can see that aspects of both essays can be roled to determine that just like any groups of a society the two primaeval groups of Ruperts land were at times separated other times they were not. I would tend to sway more to Sprys well researched essay, but Pannekoeks positive points must withal be mentioned to beat a broad picture. This is best done by addressing the respective essay one at a time, then bringing just about ideas together. Before I get right down to analyse Pannekoek and Spry I must give the general background that the two essay use as their base. The Ruperts Land of Red River has many ethnic groups. The two that are concentrated on, as Pannekoek I believe accurately puts it, are the English speak Protestant mixed blood (Half-breeds, respectively) and the French speaking Catholic mixed blood (Metis, respectively) . It must also be know the location of Ruperts Land to get a proper mental picture of the events. Ruperts Land, Red River, was in what today would be (fill in later when you find location). The main point that Frits Pannekoek makes in her essay is as follows. Panekoek reasons that there are differences between the Metis and the Half-breeds that led them to form to groups apart from each other, with a bitter relationship between the two . Pannekoek believes that In accompaniment there was little unity between the two groups during the Riel Resistance . I must start of my first main point by saying that subjective there is much reliability to what Frits Pannekoek is saying.